Posting Feeder 2.2 Podcasts

Exporting Your Podcast as an MP3

Mac: GarageBand

At the top of your screen, click “Share” and then “Export song to disk.” 

Make sure the box next to “Compress” is checked, and change “AAC Encoder” to “mp3 Encoder.” Change “High Quality” to “Good Quality.” Click Export and choose a location for your file.

Windows: Audacity

Click this link for an explanation of how to install the MP3 codec:

http://audacity.sourceforge.net/help/faq?s=install&i=lame-mp3

This is a little more complicated! But if you run into problems you can rely on me and your group members.

Getting Your MP3 on Your Blog


1. Go to www.divshare.com and sign up for an account.


2. Once you’re in your dashboard click the big green button that says “upload a new file.


3. Click the “Choose File” button, locate your mp3 on your computer, and upload it to divshare (note: you’ll have to click the green “upload” button once you’ve chosen your file)


4. Once your file is done uploading, click “Dashboard” at the top of the page, and your mp3 file should be listed near the bottom of the page. Click the link that says “embed” under your file name. Scroll down to the box labeled “embed code.” Copy this code and paste it into the “create post” window on your blog. Make sure you’ve clicked the tab that says “Edit html,” otherwise it won’t work.

IMRAD for Posting These PowerPoints

Writing a Scientific Research Report Part I:

https://docs.google.com/fileview?id=0B11JiXOw1yx0YzlhNzY1NzUtMzA2OS00NjBlLTg3ZWItZDk2MzI5ZmRmNGU4&hl=en&authkey=CLupqaEK

Part II:

https://docs.google.com/fileview?id=0B11JiXOw1yx0NjVlMzM3NTYtYzI4Ny00MmFlLTlhMmEtNDlhMGE4MjU4NmY1&hl=en&authkey=CO6Cra4E

Unit 2 Project Pre-Writing

Once you finish the draft workshop, you can use the remainder of the class period in one of two ways:

1. You can implement the feedback you received on your Feeder 2.2 podcast.

2. You can begin pre-writing for your Unit 2 Project podcast. If you choose this route, I suggest that you work in pairs. Begin by explaining the results of your study to your partner and showing him or her the data that you collected. From there, return to your notes on today's PowerPoint presentation and work with your partner to begin figuring out what information will go in your results section and what you will say in the discussion portion of your podcast. After doing this, you should have a rough outline of your podcast. If you get this far, begin thinking about how you will frame this information and how you will present it to your listener clearly and succinctly. As you make decisions about these aspects of your podcast, begin transforming the rough outline of your podcast into a more detailed script.

Homework: You should have a detailed script for your Unit 2 Project, which we will workshop on Thursday. Also, your Feeder 2.2 podcast should be ready to post by class time on Thursday. On Thursday we will talk about how to export your podcast as an mp3 file and upload it to the internet.

Feeder 2.2 Draft Workshop

Listen to your partner's podcast at least once without stopping, then answer the following questions on a new Google Doc titled "[your name]'s feedback on [partner's name]'s podcast:"

1. Describe the author's implementation of the middle style. Is it a higher or lower take on the middle style? Does the author come off as a credible scientist? What aspects of the podcast contribute most to the author's voice? Be as specific as possible.

2. Do you zone out or become disoriented at any point in the podcast? At what point does the author lose your attention? Does s/he read too slowly or too quickly? Is the recording clear and easy to understand?

3. Describe how the author has implemented post-production techniques such as the addition of music, sound effects, etc. Do these help you to understand the content of the podcast or do they distract you from it?

4. Has the author done everything required for both the Introduction and Methods and Materials sections? Is this information clearly highlighted? Does the author do a good job of explaining the experiment without summarizing the results? Does the podcast sound too much or not enough like a proper scientific research report? What changes might the author make in order to enhance his or her credibility or come off as more approachable?

Now, read these questions and then listen to the podcast again, thinking about how you will answer each question. If you need to listen again, rewind and listen to part of the podcast again. When you're done, answer these questions:

1. How does the author attempt to grab the reader's attention? Do you think the reader will be "hooked" within 10-15 seconds? Can the author's attention-getter be described as one of the more or less effective introductions we talked about? Explain your answer.

2. At what point does the author transition from the Introduction section to the Methods and Materials section? Describe how this transition takes place and how the author signals to the reader that s/he should be listening for a new idea. Identify any other transitions that are unclear or confusing.

3. Is the hypothesis highlighted clearly? Can the author be absolutely sure that even a casual listener will understand the experiment's hypothesis? How does the author highlight this information? How might it be highlighted more clearly?

After you have answered all of these questions in the Google Doc, take 5 minutes to converse with your author, explaining both your answers to the questions as well as any more general or specific comments that didn't come up in your written feedback. Also, feel free to share any tips for using the recording software that the author might find helpful.

Example Podcasts

I know some of you were having trouble getting started, so it might be helpful to listen to what past students have done. Here are a few links:

http://science4kidz.blogspot.com/2010/04/cussing-experiment-results-by-devin.html

http://wefivefreshman.blogspot.com/2010/04/extra-extra-hear-all-about-it-college.html

http://uncgroup2.blogspot.com/2010/04/suzies-podcast-22.html 

These podcasts aren't perfect by any means, but they might help you get started and realize what's possible with the tools you have at your disposal. One thing I will say is that I think most of these could have been more ambitious in the ways the authors used effects to signal transitions; so these aren't the target, they're a jumping off point. I want you to wow me!

Feeder 2.2 Podcast Workshop

Today we will begin recording the Feeder 2.2 podcasts that you scripted last week. PC users will want to begin by downloading and installing the Audacity recording software:

http://audacity.sourceforge.net/

Mac users will have an easier time with GarageBand, which is probably already installed on your computer. If you don't have GarageBand, there is a version of Audacity available for Mac as well.

Once you have the software up and running, you may want to begin by recording your own voice and using some of the program's effects to manipulate the sound wave by cutting and pasting, overdubbing, or transforming it through effects. As we talked about during our discussion of the RadioLab podcast, these bells and whistles can be useful tools for orienting your listener, but remember that you want your listeners to pay attention to WHAT is being said, not HOW you're saying it.

As you get going, you may find yourself in need of sound effects and/or background music. As we discussed in class, you should be sure to obey the rules about intellectual property that we talked about. The following web sites provide free, legal samples that you can use in your podcast (note: some may require registration in order for you to download):

http://www.freesfx.co.uk/

http://www.soundsnap.com/

http://incompetech.com/m/c/royalty-free/

http://www.musicalley.com/

http://www.freesound.org/

Once you download these sound files to your computer, you can drag them directly into GarageBand or add them into your Audacity project by going to File > Import > Audio. Once the sound is in your project you can use the program's tools to move it around and manipulate it just like you did with your voice.

We'll spend the entirety of today's class working on your podcasts, and you can rely on me and your group members for help realizing the ideas you spelled out in your scripts. In addition, during Thursday's optional class I will be available to help you troubleshoot any problems you run into. You can also search the web for general tutorials on podcasting or specific tutorials about making a particular sound or effect.

You will need to bring a draft of your Feeder 2.2 podcast (i.e. something for your workshop partner to listen to) to class on Tuesday, November 9. NOTE: Please bring a set of headphones to EVERY class meeting from now on; you will need these in order to workshop your podcasts.

Feeder 2.2 Script Workshop

1. How does the author attempt to grab the reader's attention? It will be helpful to think not just about what the author is saying--i.e. the words s/he is using them--but HOW s/he says them. Will there be music? Sound effects? Will these methods work? If we assume that a potential listener is going to give us 10 seconds of devoted attention before making up his or her mind about whether to listen, do you think this author will have grabbed the listener by that time? Why or why not?

2. When we listened to the RadioLab podcast we talked a lot about the ratio of scripted vs. unscripted content. What do you think that ratio will be in your partner's podcast? Do you think that ratio is appropriate given the tenets of the middle style? How might the author work in more unscripted content? How might the author integrate different voices, sounds, and other effects that might add dynamism to the finished product?

3. How does the author explain the experiment in the Methods and Materials section? How does the author deal with the problem of representing quantitative data orally? Do you think the listener will be able to understand precisely how the experiment works? Do you think the listener could repeated the experiment precisely him or herself? Suggest ways in which the author might make this Methods and Materials section clearer.

4. Your finished podcast will contain at least two main sections: Introduction and Methods and Materials. How does the author signals the transition between those two sections (or any others the podcast might include)? Do you think these transitions will be effective? Why or why not?

5. How has the author attempted to establish and maintain his or her scientific credibility? We noted on Tuesday that there is a fine line between being accessible and losing one's credibility; where does the author's voice and content reside on this line? If the author were to shoot for a slightly "higher" take on the middle style, how might the script change? Conversely, how would it change if the author were to go "lower?"